Tentative Ruling: VLADIMIR MYASNYANKIN vs. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AN OHIO CORPORATION, ET AL
Case Number
CV0005564
Case Type
Hearing Date / Time
Tue, 05/12/2026 - 13:30
Nature of Proceedings
1) MOTION – COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES – DISCOVERY FACILITATOR PROGRAM 2) MOTION – COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES – DISCOVERY FACILITATOR PROGRAM 3) MOTION – COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES – DISCOVERY FACILITATOR PROGRAM
Tentative Ruling
The Court expresses its appreciation for the assistance of Steven Perl, Esq., the Court’s discovery facilitator, in resolving much of this discovery dispute.
- Defendant Nationwide’s motion to compel further responses to Special Interrogatories Nos. 27-30 is granted in part. Plaintiff shall respond to the interrogatories regarding all persons or entities who were engaged in the physical inspection, remediation, demolition, construction, repair and/or renovation of the property during the time period. Plaintiffs have made no showing of burden. However, upon such a showing the Court will consider setting an exemption for de minimis work on the property.
- Defendants Lathrum and Austin’s motion to compel Request for Production No. 3 is denied. The request is overly broad and intrusive, and Defendants have failed to demonstrate a compelling need for the information.
- Defendant Nationwide’s motion to compel Request for Production No. 13 is granted in part. Plaintiffs have agreed to produce, and are ordered to produce, forms W-2, 1099, and Schedule C for the time period. There is no basis to require the production of tax returns.